Thanks for reading the article, thing is that there is no single good response, everyone is just trying to understand how to think about these systems. And by no means I've covered all my points in one article, it's not posssible. I'm fully aware that it is quite easy to rebutt each single point, but rebutting all the points in such a way that you don't change your take on the capabilities of these systems that is something else.

We want a unified system to understand these systems and we don't have one. And discussing the idea in broader context is the only way to reach any type of consesnus.